Debunking 'Nice Jesus'

 

Jesus Christ didn’t sing “All You Need Is Love”, he wasn’t a flower power, star-child bohemian and he didn’t compromise with degenerate, god-rejecting nullifidians

The Jewish Media has done a knock-out job of distorting and perverting the true nature of Jesus Christ of the Holy Bible. They have portrayed him as a passive resister, appeaser, and OHM chanting hippie…this is a total misrepresentation of the truth. While Jesus did indeed preach a gospel of love, compassion and forgiveness, he also had zero tolerance for bullcrap, was uncompromising, confrontational, militant and stern. He condemned. He denounced. He caused trouble and he disrupted the established order

 Here are some examples:

-Jesus Christ was a carpenter, a man’s man, he wasn’t a hairstylist or a white collar business man

-Jesus was extremely confrontational and put people on blast right in public; he called the Pharisees and Scribes fools, vipers, hypocrites, Sepulchers, Sons of the Devil. He labels them murderers and blind guides, he ridicules them publicly. He undermines their authority. He insults them. He castigates them. He’s not very nice to them (Matthew 23).

- Jesus made a whip from cords and chased the wicked money changers out the temple and flipping over their tables (John 2:15)

-Jesus instructed his disciples to arm themselves, even selling their possessions to buy a weapon in case they didn’t have one (Luke 22:36)

- Jesus was a ZEALOT to the word of God, there was no compromise or middle ground with unbelievers or the secular world.

-Jesus rebukes and condemns. In Matthew 18, Jesus utilizes morbid and violent imagery, saying that it would be better to drown in the sea with a stone around your neck than to harm a child.

-Jesus didn’t say there was many different ways to live ones life; he said he was the ONLY way (John 14:6). Most people would hate Jesus if he was around today because of this. They don’t want to live by God’s laws, statutes and commandments. They want to do whatever and accept whoever and live by: “To each his own.”

- Jesus Christ says he did not come to bring peace to this world but a sword and that belief in him would divide families (Matthew 10:34-35)

-Jesus did not when you are lukewarm in your ways. "because you are lukewarm--neither hot nor cold--I am about to spit you out of my mouth" (Revelation 3:16)

-When the Lord Jesus returns he’s not coming back to give big teddy bear hugs but to bring destruction to the nonbelievers and secular world (2 Thessalonians 1:8-9 and 2 Peter 3:10-11)

- On judgment day Jesus will sentence most of the world into the eternal lake of fire (Matthew 25:41, Revelation 20:15 and Revelation 21:8).

From fellow brother in Christ Matt Walsh:

“Anger is good when it is directed at things that offend not us, but God. Just as Christ’s intolerance, like the intolerance we’re commanded to have, stems from a desire to save souls and defend Truth.
Even when we have righteous anger, we do not have carte blanche to act on it in anyway we please. But, according to the Bible, there are times to use strong language, there are times to cause a scene, there are times to hurt people’s feelings, and there are times when we might need to use physical force.

Jesus told us to turn the other cheek when we are personally attacked; He never told us to turn our backs entirely and let lies spread and evil grow.”

I think passive-aggressiveness among true followers of Jesus Christ in general–and leaders in particular–must go away because it runs counter to the ethics of the Kingdom.

Jesus was not passive-aggressive. The Lord did not hesitate to address people directly as needed. No cryptic messages when He stood before Pilate, not parable at the house of Simon the Pharisee ("You did not wash my feet."), and in sending a message directly to Herod

So, enough with the niceties.

Christians in this country sound too similar to the Golden Girls song, and not enough like the Battle Hymn of the Republic. There’s too much ‘thank you for being a friend,’ and not enough ‘lightening from His terrible swift sword.’

We’re all hugging and singing Kumbaya, when we should be marching and shouting Hallelujah.

We’re nice Christ followers with our nice Jesus, and we are trampled on without protest.
Enough, already.”

 PART 2 - WHY BE A MILITANT CHRIST DISCIPLE AGAINST THE KINGDOM OF EVIL?

The Bible is full of military terminology yet many Christians persist in the mentality that the body of Christ is not supposed to be a militant body of people waging an aggressive warfare against the kingdom of Hell. It is high time that we face up to the fact that God has not called us to giddy church gatherings, single's night meetings, or Jesus rock concerts, but He has rather called us to WAR AGAINST THE WORKS OF DARKNESS, both in our personal lives and in the world around us.

 If we are called soldiers (2 Tim. 2:3-4) and we have been given spiritual weapons and armor (Eph. 6:10-18) and corporately we are led by Jesus Christ called our Captain (Heb. 2:9-10), what else can you call the Church but a militant body? If anyone claims to be part of this body they had better get ready for battle or run and join the enemy's ranks, for the Body of Christ is a militant, aggressive spiritual army, anything else is a counterfeit

 Jesus's example of love was engaging in a battle to the death with Satan for our souls. True love is not spending hours in front of a television, or wasting time and money in shopping malls, sports arenas or recreational outings. True love is not covering over sin with false human compassion while souls pour into Hell by the thousands. Churches have for the most part degenerated into prosperous social clubs full of people caring about nothing but themselves and their own ambitions

1 John 3:8 tells us that Jesus was manifested to destroy the works of the devil. Christians of today look glibly at this scripture and say, "We don't have to do anything because Jesus did it all!" What a foolish and ignorant mentality. If the work of Satan was completely destroyed then why is sin accelerating at such a rapid pace? Why are people (including many Christians) so vexed, tormented, physically sick, addicted to drugs and alcohol and given over to all kinds of perversions? Obviously these are not the works of God, they are works of the devil.

Pleasure seeking, pacifistic Christians are like lambs who are coerced by the lion to drop their guard and lie down in a false peace, only to be DEVOURED! One reason this happens is because too many Christians wrongly believe that to manifest God's love they must be weak, pacifistic and unoffensive. While in reality, God's love is an active, aggressive force that will inevitably clash with sin, both in us and around us. True peace can only be obtained as a result of the power of God conquering the works of darkness in our lives. The love of God is what motivates the true Christ followers to war against Satan for the souls of men. The "peace" which apathetic, pacifistic Christians claim to have is a deception, a false peace, which comes as a result of making a treaty with the enemy. This false peace allows Christians to live after their own desires and "enjoy the good life" as multitudes of souls pour into Hell. True love will motivate us to action, it will motivate us to lay down our lives, pick up our cross and follow the Crucified One.

There can never be peace on earth as long as Satan is free to kill, steal and destroy. The Bible plainly tells us that the world will have peace, but only after Satan is bound up and cast into the lake of fire. There is no scripture in the entire Old or New Testaments which tells us that there will be a peacefull entrance into eternal life. In fact, from Genesis to Revelation the Bible is full of military examples, analogies and terminology. The true peace of God can only be secured by making a stand and going to war against the enemy. If you are floating around inside of a peaceful, passive bubble while claiming to be a follower of Jesus, you had better wake up because you have swallowed the devil's lie. While denominations continue to multiply, living selfishly, squabbling over petty doctrines and exhibiting their religious works, the true Body of Christ will carry on its offensive against Satan's kingdom, destroying the works of darkness and setting the captives free. Why wait any longer, join the ranks of God's army today. Get MILITANT against sin, get AGGRESSIVE against evil, do something with your life that will really count.

Whenever we pass out anointed literature, preach anointed messages against sin, or witness to sinners, we are destroying the works of Satan. We don't destroy the works of Satan with our meaningless church programs, with our social activities and fellowships, or by sitting in our comfortable pews Sunday after Sunday. Religious activities will never do damage to the kingdom of Hell. We will destroy the works of Satan by taking aggressive, MILITANT ACTION against him.

 God has armed His people with the Sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God, both spoken and written, yet this sword has been sheathed by the false church and counted as unnecessary. At the same time, the true Body of Christ has always wielded the Sword of the Spirit in the relentless struggle to defeat sin and defend the faith. The death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ was a decisive and devastating blow against Satan. It gave us an undisputed advantage over Him. Yet unless we actively press that advantage, Satan will be free to continue his merciless campaign of destruction against mankind without opposition. If we insist upon avoiding the issue and neglecting our duty while multitudes of people are destroyed by sin then God will hold us accountable for what we should have done, for what we could have done while we had the chance. Pacifism and true Christianity do not mix.

 The Bible tells us to be sober and vigilant because Satan, our adversary, roams around as a lion, seeking whom he may devour. (1 Peter 5:8-9) In this same portion of Scripture, we are also commanded to RESIST Satan. James 4:7, "Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil (not ignore him) and he will flee from you." This word "resist" in the Greek is defined as "to fight against, to exert oneself against, to counteract or defeat, to withstand the force or effect of, to EXERT FORCE IN OPPOSITION OF!" So we see that to resist is not just a passive turning away of the head, but it is actually AGGRESSIVE ACTION AGAINST OPPOSITION.

You don't have to be a genius to see that what the Bible commands us to do is altogether different from what the modern version of Christianity teaches. In this age too many Christians have become apathetic and pacifistic towards lost and dying humanity. They could care less if the devil is conducting a full-scale murder campaign against the inhabitants of this world. They don't want to hear about warfare or fighting against sin and Satan. All they want is a Christianity where everyone always feels warm and happy, all they want is a peaceful Christianity when there is no peace! True and lasting peace will only be secured as we engage in spirit combat, conquering the forces of the enemy by the power of our God.

Jesus Himself used military terminology in telling us how the Kingdom of God is possessed. He told us in Matthew 11:12 that, "...the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force." At the time when Jesus was speaking this scripture the powerful Roman Empire ruled the world. Jesus knew that the Roman army's military might gave them the ability to otherthrow kingdoms and bring whole nations under their control. Jesus knew it was going to take this same kind of militant force to overthrow Satan's kingdom which he has established in our lives and in the lives of others. It is going to take SPIRITUAL WARRIORS AND WARFARE to establish the Kingdom of God. Satan will not relinquish his position by us ignoring him or asking him nicely to leave. He must be conquered, driven out and vanquished from his former power and positions by spiritual force.

 

It’s time that Christ Followers regain its fighting spirit; the spirit of Christ.
It’s time we ask that question: ‘What would Jesus do?’
It’s time we answer it truthfully: Jesus would flip tables and yell.
Maybe we ought to follow suit.

NEVER TRUST A FOUNDATION JEW DONT KNOW

YOU'LL NEVER SEE A Rothschild family OR Warburg family MEMBER LISTED ON THE Forbes FORTUNE 500 LIST BECAUSE THE WEALTHIEST OF THE WEALTHY HOLD TAX-EXEMPT "TRUSTS" AND "FOUNDATIONS" WHERE THEY CAN HIDE ALL THEIR DEVIL-MADE ASSETS BEHIND A CURTAIN OF ACCOUNTABILITY AND PLAY "CARE-TAKER" OR "GUARDIAN" TO THE WEALTH ITSELF... U CANNOT SUE THESE CREATURES FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY OR TAKE BACK WHAT THEY HAVE STOLEN FROM THE WORLD "LEGALLY"..THEY ARE NOT HELD ACCOUNTABLE... ALL OF THE MONEY GETS INHERITED BY THEIR PROGENY AND NEVER WILL THE GOYIM SEE A DIME OF IT BECAUSE IT DOESN'T REALLY BELONG TO ANYBODY BUT A MAKE BELIEVE ENTITY..SHALOM.. WINK WINK WINK ;/

CHILD SEX SLAVES AND PEDO-RINGS IN THE ELITE CIRCLES

https://archive.org/details/TexasMonthlyMay1982-TomPhilpott-TheCaseOfTheCampusCrusader

http://childabuserecovery.com/european-royals-killing-naked-children-for-fun-at-human-hunting-parties/#.VStxA5PKvPv



1981 CHILD SEX SLAVE DOCUMENTARY - MAN IN THE MIDDLE COMMITTED "SUICIDE"

 AN FBI MAN  "TED GUNDERSON" SENT TO INVESTIGATE CHILD SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE RINGS BUT COULDNT GET TOGETHER A REAL CASE?? WTF??? HE WAS A GATE KEEPER TO THE INFORMATION.. I BET HE WAS FUCKING KIDS TOO... WHAT BETTER THEN TO SEND TED OUT TO ACT AS IF HES INVESTIGATING IT.. HE WAS MARRIED TO DIANA RIVELY WHO WAS THE WIDOW OF JEW "ANTON LEVY" FOUNDER OF THE CHURCH OF SATAN.
http://barbarahartwellvscia.blogspot.se/2011/05/ted-gunderson-church-of-satan.html

 This article appears in the August 26, 2005 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.
Satanic Subversion of the U.S. Military

by Jeffrey Steinberg

Reprinted from EIR, July 2, 1999.

On Feb. 5, 1999, in U.S. District Court in Lincoln, Nebraska, an extraordinary hearing occurred in Paul A. Bonacci v. Lawrence E. King, a civil action in which the plaintiff charged that he had been ritualistically abused by the defendant, as part of a nationwide pedophile ring linked to powerful political figures in Washington and to elements of the U.S. military and intelligence establishment. Three weeks later, on Feb. 27, Judge Warren K. Urbom ordered King, who is currently in Federal prison, to pay $1 million in damages to Bonacci, in what Bonacci's attorney John DeCamp said was a clear signal that "the evidence presented was credible."

During the Feb. 5 hearing, Noreen Gosch stunned the court with sworn testimony linking U.S. Army Lt. Col. Michael Aquino (ret.) to the nationwide pedophile ring. Her son, Johnny, then 12 years old, was kidnapped off the streets of West Des Moines, Iowa, on Sept. 5, 1982, while he was doing his early-morning newspaper deliveries. Since his kidnapping, she has devoted all of her time and resources to finding her son, and to exposing the dangers that millions of children in America face from this hideous, literally Satanic underground of ritualistic deviants.

"We have investigated, we have talked to so far 35 victims of this said organization that took my son and is responsible for what happened to Paul, and they can verify everything that has happened," she told the court.

"What this story involves is an elaborate function, I will say, that was an offshoot of a government program. The MK-Ultra program was developed in the 1950s by the CIA. It was used to help spy on other countries during the Cold War because they felt that the other countries were spying on us.

"It was very successful. They could do it very well."

Then, the Aquino bombshell: "Well, then there was a man by the name of Michael Aquino. He was in the military. He had top Pentagon clearances. He was a pedophile. He was a Satanist. He's founded the Temple of Set. And he was a close friend of Anton LaVey. The two of them were very active in ritualistic sexual abuse. And they deferred funding from this government program to use [in] this experimentation on children.

"Where they deliberately split off the personalities of these children into multiples, so that when they're questioned or put under oath or questioned under lie detector, that unless the operator knows how to question a multiple-personality disorder, they turn up with no evidence."

She continued: "They used these kids to sexually compromise politicians or anyone else they wish to have control of. This sounds so far out and so bizarre I had trouble accepting it in the beginning myself until I was presented with the data. We have the proof. In black and white."

Under questioning from DeCamp, Gosch reported: "I know that Michael Aquino has been in Iowa. I know that Michael Aquino has been to Offutt Air Force Base [a Strategic Air Command base, near Omaha, which was linked to King's activities]. I know that he has had contact with many of these children."

Paul Bonacci, who was simultaneously a victim and a member of the nationwide pedophile crime syndicate, has subsequently identified Aquino as the man who ordered the kidnapping of Johnny Gosch. In his Feb. 5 testimony, Bonacci referred to the mastermind of the Gosch abduction as "the Colonel."

A second witness who testified at the Feb. 5 hearing, Rusty Nelson, was King's personal photographer. He later described to EIR another incident which linked King to Aquino, while the Army special forces officer was still on active reserve duty. Some time in the late 1980s, Nelson was with King at a posh hotel in downtown Minneapolis, when he personally saw King turn over a suitcase full of cash and bearer-bonds to "the Colonel," whom he later positively identified as Aquino. According to Nelson, King told him that the suitcase of cash and bonds was earmarked for the Nicaraguan Contras, and that "the Colonel" was part of the covert Contra support apparatus, otherwise associated with Lt. Col. Oliver North, Vice President George Bush, and the "secret parallel government" that they ran from the White House.

Just who is Lt. Col. Michael Aquino (ret.), and what does the evidence revealed in a Nebraska court hearing say about the current state of affairs inside the U.S. military? Is the Aquino case some kind of weird aberration that slipped off the Pentagon radar screen?

Not in the least.
Aquino, Satan, and the U.S. Military

Throughout much of the 1980s, Aquino was at the center of a controversy involving the Pentagon's acquiescence to outright Satanic practices inside the military services. Aquino was also a prime suspect in a series of pedophile scandals involving the sexual abuse of hundreds of children, including the children of military personnel serving at the Presidio U.S. Army station in the San Francisco Bay Area. Furthermore, even as Aquino was being investigated by Army Criminal Investigation Division officers for involvement in the pedophile cases, he retained highest-level security clearances, and was involved in pioneering work in military psychological operations ("psy-ops").

On Aug. 14, 1987, San Francisco police raided Aquino's Russian Hill home, which he shared with his wife Lilith. The raid was in response to allegations that the house had been the scene of a brutal rape of a four-year-old girl. The principal suspect in the rape, a Baptist minister named Gary Hambright, was indicted in September 1987 on charges that he committed "lewd and lascivious acts" with six boys and four girls, ranging in age from three to seven years, during September-October 1986. At the time of the alleged sex crimes, Hambright was employed at a child care center on the U.S. Army base at Presidio. At the time of Hambright's indictment, the San Francisco police charged that he was involved in at least 58 separate incidents of child sexual abuse.

According to an article in the Oct. 30, 1987 San Francisco Examiner, one of the victims had identified Aquino and his wife as participants in the child rape. According to the victim, the Aquinos had filmed scenes of the child being fondled by Hambright in a bathtub. The child's description of the house, which was also the headquarters of Aquino's Satanic Temple of Set, was so detailed, that police were able to obtain a search warrant. During the raid, they confiscated 38 videotapes, photo negatives, and other evidence that the home had been the hub of a pedophile ring, operating in and around U.S. military bases.

Aquino and his wife were never indicted in the incident. Aquino claimed that he had been in Washington at the time, enrolled in a year-long reserve officers course at the National Defense University, although he did admit that he made frequent visits back to the Bay Area and to his church/home. The public flap over the Hambright indictment did prompt the U.S. Army to transfer Aquino from the Presidio, where he was the deputy director of reserve training, to the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center in St. Louis.

On April 19, 1988, the ten-count indictment against Hambright was dropped by U.S. Attorney Joseph Russoniello, on the grounds that, while there was clear evidence of child abuse (six of the children contracted the venereal disease, chlamydia), there was insufficient evidence to link Hambright (or the Aquinos) to the crimes. Parents of several of the victims charged that Russoniello's actions proved that "the Federal system has broken down in not being able to protect the rights of citizens age three to eight."

Russoniello would later be implicated in efforts to cover up the links between the Nicaraguan Contras and South American cocaine-trafficking organizations, raising deeper questions about whether the decision not to prosecute Hambright and Aquino had "national security implications."

Indeed, on April 22, 1989, the U.S. Army sent letters to the parents of at least 56 of the children believed to have been molested by Hambright, urging them to have their children tested for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), because Hambright, a former daycare center worker, was reported to be a carrier.

On May 13, 1989, the San Jose Mercury reported that Aquino and his wife had been recently questioned by Army investigators about charges of child molestation by the couple in two northern California counties, Sonoma and Mendocino. A 9-year-old girl in Santa Rosa, California, and an 11-year-old boy in Fort Bragg, also in California, separately identified Aquino as the rapist in a series of 1985 incidents, after they had seen him on television.
Softies on Satan

When the San Francisco Chronicle contacted Army officials at the Presidio to find out if Aquino's security clearances had been lifted as the result of the pedophile investigations, the reporters were referred to the Pentagon, where Army spokesman Maj. Greg Rixon told them: "The question is whether he is trustworthy or can do the job. There is nothing that would indicate in this case that there is any problem we should be concerned about."

Indeed, the Pentagon had already given its de facto blessings to Aquino's long-standing public association with the Church of Satan and his own successor "church," the Temple of Set. This, despite the fact that Aquino's Satanic activities involved overt support for neo-Nazi movements in the United States and Europe. On Oct. 10, 1983, while travelling in West Germany on "official NATO business," Aquino had staged a Satanic "working" at the Wewelsburg Castle in Bavaria. Aquino wrote a lengthy account of the ritual, in which he invoked Nazi SS chief Heinrich Himmler: "As the Wewelsburg was conceived by Heinrich Himmler to be the 'Mittelpunkt der Welt' ('Middle of the World'), and as the focus of the Hall of the Dead was to be the Gate of that Center, to summon the Powers of Darkness at their most powerful locus."

As early as April 1978, the U.S. Army had circulated A Handbook for Chaplains "to facilitate the provision of religious activities." Both the Church of Satan and the Temple of Set were listed among the "other" religions to be tolerated inside the U.S. military. A section of the handbook dealing with Satanism stated, "Often confused with witchcraft, Satanism is the worship of Satan (also known as Baphomet or Lucifer). Classical Satanism, often involving 'black masses,' human sacrifices, and other sacrilegious or illegal acts, is now rare. Modern Satanism is based on both the knowledge of ritual magick and the 'anti-establishment' mood of the 1960s. It is related to classical Satanism more in image than substance, and generally focuses on 'rational self-interest with ritualistic trappings.' "

Not so fast! In 1982, the Temple of Set fissured over the issue of Aquino's emphasis on Nazism. One leader, Ronald K. Barrett, shortly after his expulsion, wrote that Aquino had "taken the Temple of Set in an explicitly Satanic direction, with strong overtones of German National Socialist Nazi occultism.... One fatality has occurred within the Temple membership during the period covered, May 1982-July 1983."

The handbook quoted "Nine Satanic Statements" from the Church of Satan, without comment. "Statement Seven," as quoted in the handbook, read, "Satan represents man as just another animal, sometimes better, more often worse than those that walk on all fours, who, because of his 'divine and intellectual development' has become the most vicious animal of all."
From 'Psyops' to 'Mindwars'

Aquino's steady rise up the hierarchy of the Satanic world closely paralleled his career advances inside the U.S. military. According to an official biography circulated by the Temple of Set, "Dr. Aquino is High Priest and chief executive officer of the Temple of Set, the nation's principal Satanic church, in which he holds the degree of Ipissimus VI. He joined the original Church of Satan in 1969, becoming one of its chief officials by 1975 when the Temple of Set was founded. In his secular profession he is a Lieutenant Colonel, Military Intelligence, U.S. Army, and is qualified as a Special Forces officer, Civil Affairs officer, and Defense Attaché. He is a graduate of the Command and General Staff College, the National Defense University and the Defense Intelligence College, and the State Department's Foreign Service Institute."

Indeed, a more detailed curriculum vitae that Aquino provided to EIR, dated March 1989, claimed that he had gotten his doctorate at the University of California at Santa Barbara in 1980, with his dissertation on "The Neutron Bomb." He listed 16 separate military schools that he attended during 1968-87, including advanced courses in "Psychological Operations" at the JFK Special Warfare Center at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, and "Strategic Intelligence" at the Defense Intelligence College, at Bolling Air Force Base in Washington, D.C.

Aquino was deeply involved in what has been called the "revolution in military affairs" ("RMA"), the introduction of the most kooky "Third Wave," "New Age" ideas into military long-range planning, which introduced such notions as "information warfare" and "cyber-warfare" into the Pentagon's lexicon.

In the early 1980s, at the same time that Heidi and Alvin Toffler were spinning their Tavistock "Third Wave" utopian claptrap to some top Air Force brass, Aquino and another U.S. Army colonel, Paul Vallely, were co-authoring an article for Military Review. Although the article was never published in the journal, the piece was widely circulated among military planners, and was distributed by Aquino's Temple of Set. The article, titled "From PSYOP to Mindwar: The Psychology of Victory," endorsed some of the ideas published in a 1980 Military Review article by Lt. Col. John Alexander, an affiliate of the Stanford Research Institute, a hotbed of Tavistock Institute and Frankfurt School "New Age" social engineering.

Aquino and Vallely called for an explicitly Nietzschean form of warfare, which they dubbed "mindwar." "Like the sword Excalibur," they wrote, "we have but to reach out and seize this tool; and it can transform the world for us if we have but the courage and the integrity to guide civilization with it. If we do not accept Excalibur, then we relinquish our ability to inspire foreign cultures with our morality. If they then devise moralities unsatisfactory to us, we have no choice but to fight them on a more brutish level."

And what is "mindwar?" "The term is harsh and fear-inspiring," Aquino wrote. "And it should be: It is a term of attack and victory—not one of rationalization and coaxing and conciliation. The enemy may be offended by it; that is quite all right as long as he is defeated by it. A definition is offered: Mindwar is the deliberate, aggressive convincing of all participants in a war that we will win that war."

For Aquino, "mindwar" is a permanent state of strategic psychological warfare against the populations of friend and foe nations alike. "In its strategic context, mindwar must reach out to friends, enemies and neutrals alike across the globe ... through the media possessed by the United States which have the capabilities to reach virtually all people on the face of the Earth. These media are, of course, the electronic media—television and radio. State of the art developments in satellite communication, video recording techniques, and laser and optical transmission of broadcasts make possible a penetration of the minds of the world such as would have been inconceivable just a few years ago." Above all else, Aquino argues, mindwar must target the population of the United States, "by denying enemy propaganda access to our people, and by explaining and emphasizing to our people the rationale for our national interest.... Rather it states a whole truth that, if it does not now exist, will be forced into existence by the will of the United States."
      
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMartin_preschool_trial
The McMartin preschool trial was a day care sexual abuse case of the 1980s, prosecuted by the Los Angelas District Attorney Ira Reiner . Members of the McMartin family, who operated a preschool in California, were charged with numerous acts of sexual abuse of children in their care. Accusations were made in 1983. Arrests and the pretrial investigation ran from 1984 to 1987, and the trial ran from 1987 to 1990. After six years of criminal trials, no convictions were obtained, and all charges were dropped in 1990. When the trial ended in 1990 it had been the longest and most expensive criminal trial in American history.^[1] The case was part of day care sex abuse hysteria, a moral panic over alleged Satanic ritual abuse in the 1980s and early 1990s.
          

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113421/

Accurate account of Odyssey House's founding Megolamaniac and child, drug abusing Trojan horse Judianne Densen Gerber.

Mistress Of Odyssey House by PaulGallagher

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/10666875/Patricia-Hewitt-called-for-age-of-consent-to-be-lowered-to-ten.html?fb 

 

http://www.phillymag.com/news/2014/10/06/pedophilia-not-a-crime-rutgers-margo-kaplan/  

Ancient Jewish Wisdom Why Are Jews Good With Money

There is no doubt that there is a major connection between Jews and money. Even as Jews seek to sweep it under the carpet, it is still the largest elephant in the room, especially in these bad economic times

LET THE GOOD RABBI TELL YOU WHY

NEW MKULTRA DISCOVERY: Terence McKenna admited that he was a “deep background” and “PR” agent (CIA or FBI).

This explosive audio clip that was just brought to my attention today by "Scott" reveals, in Terence McKenna's own words, that he was in fact an agent.
The audio clip comes from Dec. 1994 from his lecture at the Esalen Institute, which may be found below in full.
As I wrote on August 28, 2012, in my article: How Darwin, Huxley, and the Esalen Institute launched the 2012 and psychedelic revolutions – and began one of the largest mind control operations in history. Some brief notes. (Here I've added most of the pertinent quotes from Mckenna's True Hallucinations):
"...here is an interesting episode regarding McKenna being chased by Interpol and the FBI – from which no conclusion is ever mentioned. As Henk from Europe emailed me after this original article was published:

[Henk] In 1969, McKenna traveled to Nepal led by his “interest in Tibetan painting and hallucinogenic shamanism.”[6] During his time there, he studied the Tibetan language and worked as a hashish smuggler, until “one of his Bombay-to-Aspen shipments fell into the hands of U. S. Customs.” True Hallucinations, p. 22ff:

Late in August of 1969 fate turned me from hash smuggler to fugitive when one of my Bombay-to-Aspen shipments fell into the hands of U.S. Customs. I went underground and wandered throughout Southeast Asia and Indonesia, viewing ruins in the former and collecting butterflies in the later. Then came my time in Japan. Whether this gave me an edge on the others in experience seemed unlikely.

True Hallucinations page 166:

This decision to depart California (Henk:and return to the Amazon) was hailed by my circle in Berkeley. Concern for my mental state was rife among my friends, and rumor had reached us that the FBI was aware that I was somewhere back inside the country and had begun looking for me. The Bombay-to-Aspen hashish blues were catching up with me. It was, as they say, time to make a move.

True Hallucinations pg. 179

In February of 1970, a year before I arrived at La Chorrera, my fugitive wanderings had taken me to the island of Timor in Eastern Indonesia. Under indictment in the States for the heinous crime of importing hashish, I traveled and lived under the dramatic assumption that international police agencies were combing the globe looking for me. My cover, that of a graduate student in entomology doing field work for a degree—a butterfly collector—had worked well over the previous six months

True Hallucinations pg. 186

I swallowed hard. He didn't look like the sort of person who would appreciate my stories of fighting the police at the Berkeley barricades shoulder-to-shoulder with affinity groups like the Persian Fuckers and the Acid Anarchists. Nor did my participation in the Human Be-In or the rolling orgies of the Summer of Love in the Haight-Ashbury seem appropriate to mention. And my recent stint as a hashish smuggler in India and my subsequent move undercover to avoid capture by Interpol also seemed out of place in this particular interview.
I decided to go with the usual half-truth reserved for straight people. "I am an art historian turned biologist. I went to Nepal to study Tibetan but found that I am no linguist when it comes to Asian languages. I have returned to biology, my first love. Specifically, I am an entomologist.
I am collecting butterflies here in Indonesia retracing the route of Alfred Russell Wallace. Wallace was the real discoverer of the theory of natural selection, but Darwin got all the credit. I identify with his underdog status. Wallace was shafted by Victorian science because he was of the wrong class and didn't know how to play politics the way Darwin did. Wallace explored the Amazon Basin as well and if all goes well, I hope to travel and collect there too. Eventually I will write a monograph on speciation among the butterflies of Amazonas and Eastern Indonesia, which will get me a degree. Then, who knows. Teaching perhaps. Hard to say.

[Henk] He was forced to move to avoid capture by Interpol. He wandered through Southeast Asia viewing ruins, collected butterflies in Indonesia, and worked as an English teacher in Tokyo. He then went back to Berkeley to continue studying biology, which he called “his first love”.[6] Note he fled to avoid capture by Interpol but then after a time he casually returns to Berkeley?
First of all, why would Terence friends hail the idea of him returning to the Amazon because they were concerned about his mental state while the cause of his mental state was his prior trip to the Amazon? That’s a contradiction. Why would Terence make up a reason to go back to the Amazon? Him being wanted by the FBI should be plenty reason I think.

Attempts to get an answer from Terence’s brother, Dennis, regarding the above episode have failed. It seems they want us to believe that Terence just went from being wanted by Interpol and the FBI to just casually lecturing about psychedelics. What happened in the interim? Someone must know the answer."
We finally have the conclusion to what happened to Terence after the FBI had caught him:

Questioner: I’m real curious about one thing. Why is it important for you to do this?
Terence McKenna: I wonder myself. You mean am I the alien ambassador whether I like it or not? [laughs]. Well, often when asked this question, I've said it beats honest work. I mean, my brother is a PhD in three subjects and works in hard science and yet I don't think it's brought him immense happiness. Not that he's despondent. But I was always kind of a slider. You know?
And certainly when I reached La Chorerra in 1971 I had a price on my head by the FBI, I was running out of money, I was at the end of my rope. And then they recruited me and said, "you know, with a mouth like yours there's a place for you in our organization". And I've worked in deep background positions about which the less said the better. And then about 15 years ago they shifted me into public relations and I've been there to the present.
I think ideas get me high. And I like the feeling of understanding and I love diversity to the point of weirdness.
Questioner: It seems that there's more to it than that for you. Because, you know, being tuned in to ideas and turned on by ideas is one thing, but you can keep that just to self. The sharing of it is something else. I think that's what we’re getting at. [??
Terence: well one thing is, I'm really fascinated… I think of myself as a pretty savvy person, and not easily led into false dogma…

The question remains: which agency did he work for? Was it the FBI, or the CIA? Since it was mostly the CIA doing the psychedelic studies on the masses, I think it's likely that he was CIA and is why the Agency was blocking my requests for his files several months ago: http://www.gnosticmedia.com/urgent-release-the-cias-terence-mckenna-foia-request-response-positive-affiliation/
However, in Acid Dreams, Marty Lee, states (pg. 173):

It was a typical sixties scene: a group of scruffy, long-haired students stood in a circle passing joints and hash pipes. The setting could have been Berkeley, Ann Arbor or any other hip campus. But these students were actually FBI agents, and the school they attended was known as "Hoover University." Located at Quantico Marine Base in Virginia, this elite academy specialized in training G-men to penetrate left- wing organizations. To cultivate the proper counterculture image, they were told not to wash or bathe for several days before infiltrating a group of radicals. Refresher courses were also held for FBI agents who had successfully immersed themselves in the drug culture of their respective locales. For months they had smoked pot and dropped acid with unsuspecting radicals, and now the turned-on spies had a chance to swap stories with their undercover comrades. Former FBI agent Cril Payne likened the annual seminar to a class reunion. Between lectures on the New Left, drug abuse, and FBI procedure, the G-men would sneak away to the wooded grounds to get stoned while American taxpayers footed the bill.

So there is also the possibility that he was FBI.
Lastly, some have actually tried to claim that the mushrooms recruited McKenna (which is tantamount to saying that "God" told him to do it). To this we must apply some logical deduction and critical thinking:

1) Do mushrooms have organizations, deep background and public relations (propaganda)? Or does a spy agency?
2) What would mushrooms need with a public relations or propaganda department? Or is that something a spy agency would have?
3) Would mushrooms tell him the less said the better: “deep background positions about which the less said the better”, or is that something an agency would do?
4) Do mushrooms have "positions"? Or does an agency?
5) Are the mushrooms able to pay him because he’s out of money? Or is that something an agency could do? (remember he's in trouble for smuggling)
6) Are mushrooms able to get him out of trouble with Interpol and the FBI for DRUG SMUGGLING? Or is that something an agency like the CIA or FBI could do?
7) Do mushrooms answer the story of what happened to him after his arrest? Or is that something that his employment as an agent would do?

The irony is that many don’t understand that someone who is in public relations, or propaganda, would use sophism to fool people who don’t understand logical fallacies and such manipulative tricks. Actually, that’s the entire point of propaganda in the first place.
When we understand that he was an agent, as he admits, then the contradictions are removed we don’t have to twist things into believing that magical mushroom beings or UFOs hired and paid him to work in their organization in public relations and deep background to the present – which he wasn’t allowed to discuss. These are things agencies do, not mushrooms or UFOs. Such a claim that the mushrooms recruited him is clearly ridiculous. The false claims of mushroom or aliens recruiting him is clearly a case of psychological cognitive dissonance and reaching for anything to avoid facing the facts which make one feel uncomfortable when they're faced with new information that might reveal that they were fooled. Rather than dreaming up magical beings to avoid the facts and issues, just laugh it off and admit you were fooled by those people. This way the next time it's less likely to happen to you again.

BEATNIK POET PEDO JEW ALLEN GINSBERG AT NAMBLA CONFERENCE

In 1994 NAMBLA was expelled from the International Lesbian and Gay Association, having been the first US-based organization to be a member. Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys was produced and directed by Adi Sideman in 1994. Members of NAMBLA were interviewed and presented defenses of the organization. Allen Ginsberg appeared in the film............


........

http://www.nytimes.com/1994/07/08/movies/film-review-men-who-love-boys-explain-themselves.html
Adi Sideman's crude documentary "Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys," has an inflammatory title that belies its even-handed portrait of the North American Man/Boy Love Association, the notorious pedophile organization better known as Nambla.

The film, which opens today at Cinema Village, is built around interviews with several men whose professed objects of desire are youths under the legal age of consent. One after another, they defend themselves against the view of Nambla as an organization of sadistic child molesters and pornographers, arguing that Nambla is a civil rights organization opposed to the age-of-consent laws. The more outspoken among them talk of child liberation in a "sexophobic" society.

Nambla's opponents, like Tom McDonough, who founded a conservative action group called Straight Kids U.S.A., are also heard from. Mr. McDonough is shown yelling "Baby-raper!" in a demonstration outside the apartment of a Nambla member. Participants in the 1993 gay and lesbian march on Washington express chagrin at having a Nambla contigent march in their ranks. And a Nambla member, Renato Corazzo, is shown monitoring obscene hate messages on the organization's hot line.

Nambla, founded in 1978, claims a membership of around 1,500. Besides the hot line, it publishes a monthly newsletter illustrated with photos of pubescent boys.

Among those interviewed is Peter Melzer, a teacher at the Bronx High School of Science who was suspended from his job when it became known that he was a Nambla member. Mr. Melzer says he has never broken the law.

The film's most outspoken and vivid personality, Leyland Stevenson, was imprisoned several years ago for distributing child pornography. He describes his sexual relations with boys in the quasi-religious language of a persecuted fanatic. He even allows the camera to show him cruising in a suburban mini-mall. From his attitude of messianic hauteur, it is clear why Mr. Stevenson was chased out of his West Virginia town. And his creepy grandiosity casts a clammy chill over the film.

"Red Light, Green Light," the short film that accompanies "Chicken Hawk," teaches children to identify adult strangers who may be molesters. It presents a series of scenarios it calls "red light" situations in which a stranger's advances should send up warning alarms. CHICKEN HAWK Men Who Love Boys

Directed and produced by Adi Sideman; director of photography and editor, Nadav Harel; music by Franck and Ravel. Running time: 55 minutes. RED LIGHT, GREEN LIGHT

Directed by Bill Brose; written by Michael Halbern; director of photography, Phil Lohmann; edited by Mark Snegoff. Running time: 20 minutes. Both films released by Stranger Than Fiction Films. At Cinema Village, 22 East 12th Street, East Village. These films are not rated.

Photo: Renato Corazza (Stranger Than Fiction Film)

Two more babies stricken with herpes after ritual ultra-orthodox Jewish oral blood sucking circumcision

Two more infants have been infected with a deadly herpes virus in the last three months after undergoing a controversial religious oral circumcision in New York City.
The latest cases bring the count to 13 infants since 2000, two of which suffered brain damage and two died from the virus which can rapidly spread throughout its body.
The ultra-Orthodox Jewish practice of metzitzah b'peh requires a practitioner to orally suck the baby's penis to 'cleanse' the open wound following its circumcision, making them susceptible to the virus.

 

Metzitzah b'peh is a homosexual-paedophile practice carried out in Talmudic Judaism, within which a mohel; that is to say a rabbi who carries out genital-mutilation; puts the freshly circumcised penis of the infant boy into his mouth and sucks it until the blood stops flowing from the wound on the child's penis.^[1] This "oral tradition" is different to the circumcision practiced in the Old Testament, rather the fellatio bris milah of the Talmudists is based on the halacha and custom (minhag).^[2] It is the only major religion which demands fellatio with children.
Generally they manage to keep knowledge of the act out of the media spotlight, but modern cases in New York City, where diseases such as herpes have been passed onto the babies, causing the death of an infant in one cases, put the practice under scrutiny.^[1][3] While Jewish journalists energetically wax-lyrical about a minority of deviant liberal-homosexuals who have infiltrated Christianity, carrying out perversions contrary to their religion, their silence is deafening when it comes to the rabbis sucking boy's penises as a matter of basic practice.


According to the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, "this procedure is widely accepted, and 60% to 90% of newborn boys of the Jewish population in the United States undergo this procedure", going on to state that it has an "important cultural and historical role".^[5] The exact number of children who fall victim to the practice is unknown; some "Reform Judaism" proponents reject the fellatio method, though still have their babies genitals mutilated. The statistics for the babies in the Zionist State itself is unknown to the outside world. Rabbi Moshe Meiselman claims that it is heresy not to perform metzitzah b'peh on the child's penis.
.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2304793/Two-babies-stricken-HERPES-ritual-oral-blood-sucking-circumcision-New-York-City.html