QUANTUM PHYSICS AND BLACK HOLES
It is a war against God. It is war against Truth. There are many things that God does not want us to know. These people want to force the public to believe that science has ALL the answers. That the universe is simply material.
(Isaac Newton, left, was a member of the "club.")
If you think, that only social sciences, law, history and literature are hijacked, you did not pay attention. Think that mathematics and physics are free? Think again.
The real achievement of people like you is rattling people awake from their stupor. It is no mean feat, taking into account that all of education, sciences, culture and media have been thoroughly corrupted for generations already.
All you hear, read and study is disinformation. It takes tremendous effort to break out from the matrix.
If you think, that only social sciences, law, history and literature are hijacked, you did not pay attention. Think that mathematics and physics are free? Think again.
Starting from this initial assumption, namely that physics had to be corrupted a long time ago, I discovered that it started with Rosicrucian Issac Newton and his laws of dynamics.
The reverse disinformation analysis shows that the missing link lies before our very eyes from the time of Newton consists of the undeniable fact that gravity has no stable foundation in physics. Never had. Therefore it cannot be incorporated in any unified field theory.
Gravity is a figment of Newtonian disinformation, resting on his naked, arbitral assumption of MASS.
What is a mass? Mass is. So said Newton. And it causes gravity obviously. Said Newton.
In reality, no mass exists and therefore there is no gravity. What we observe in microscale and macroscale is not a gravitational pull of some fundamental mass concept, but an electromagnetic phenomenon.
The so-called gravitational field is electromagnetic, exactly like radio and light is, with one generic difference, i.e. gravity comes from rotation of the electromagnetic field of elementary particles [vortex]. All particles are simply stable, self-contained, self-resonating, convoluted bunches of electromagnetic waves that vibrate and revolve, creating by this revolution a vortex, a pull on every other brother particle in the universe. That's all there is to gravity. Electromagnetic vortex.
No fundamental mass exists. There is only electromagnetic waves rotating and vibrating, that's all. The quantum mumbo-jumbo is a scam and a dead end.
There is no fundamental mass and gravity and it should be revised, starting from Newton. Why? Because he was obviously a member of THE CLUB. Check the facts and then you can start to think about it critically. Where is fundamental gravity? Nowhere. That's where it is.
--
PS-
You know the shills will ridicule this and try to find some way to throw it in the heap with UFO's and reptilians.
But the solid fact remains, that Newtonian physics cannot be combined with quarks mumbo-jumbo. I did the disinformation analysis. And it turned out the total information control, meaning sciences: mathematics, physics, history, starts with modern capitalism under London. This is an observable fact. The matrix will lash out at this feverishly, because it touches at its foundations.
All of modern science is censored and corrupted. It is an undeniable fact.
A number of Quantum Physicists are resigning their posts because it is being demanded of them that they cover up the failure of quantum physics and string theory to come up with anything useful during recent years. String theory is false. The Nobel Prize awarded for "finding" the Higgs Boson was a fraud. (ask CERN to show the evidence for their great discovery and they will not provide it). The $8 billion CERN accelerator has discovered NOTHING new. Physics is stuck. It is where it was in the late 1800's before anomalies relating to measurements of the speed of light were explicable by the mathematics of Special Relativity. But....the physics 'establishment' will not allow this to be admitted in public.
Quantum physics is claimed to support the mystical notion that the mind creates reality. However, an objective reality, with no special role for consciousness, human or cosmic, is consistent with all observations.
Certain interpretations of quantum mechanics, the revolutionary theory developed early in the century to account for the anomalous behavior of light and atoms, are being misconstrued so as to imply that only thoughts are real and that the physical universe is the product of a cosmic mind to which the human mind is linked throughout space and time. This interpretation has provided an ostensibly scientific basis for various mind-over-matter claims, from ESP to alternative medicine. “Quantum mysticism” also forms part of the intellectual backdrop for the postmodern assertion that science has no claim on objective reality.
The word “quantum” appears frequently in New Age and modern mystical literature. For example, physician Deepak Chopra (1989) has successfully promoted a notion he calls quantum healing, which suggests we can cure all our ills by the application of sufficient mental power.
According to Chopra, this profound conclusion can be drawn from quantum physics, which he says has demonstrated that “the physical world, including our bodies, is a response of the observer. We create our bodies as we create the experience of our world” (Chopra 1993, 5). Chopra also asserts that “beliefs, thoughts, and emotions create the chemical reactions that uphold life in every cell,” and “the world you live in, including the experience of your body, is completely dictated by how you learn to perceive it” (Chopra 1993, 6). Thus illness and aging are an illusion and we can achieve what Chopra calls “ageless body, timeless mind” by the sheer force of consciousness.1
Amit Goswami, in The Self-Aware Universe: How Consciousness Creates the Material World, argues that the existence of paranormal phenomena is supported by quantum mechanics:
. . . psychic phenomena, such as distant viewing and out-of-body experiences, are examples of the nonlocal operation of consciousness . . . . Quantum mechanics undergirds such a theory by providing crucial support for the case of nonlocality of consciousness.
(Goswami 1993, 136)
(Goswami 1993, 136)
Since no convincing, reproducible evidence for psychic phenomena has been found, despite 150 years of effort, this is a flimsy basis indeed for quantum consciousness.(2)
Although mysticism is said to exist in the writings of many of the early century’s prominent physicists (Wilber 1984), the current fad of mystical physics began in earnest with the publication in 1975 of Fritjof Capra’s The Tao of Physics (Capra 1975). There Capra asserted that quantum theory has confirmed the traditional teaching of Eastern mystics: that human consciousness and the universe form an interconnected, irreducible whole. An example:
To the enlightened man . . . whose consciousness embraces the universe, to him the universe becomes his “body,” while the physical body becomes a manifestation of the Universal Mind, his inner vision an expression of the highest reality, and his speech an expression of eternal truth and mantric power
Lama Anagarika
Govinda Foundations of Tibetan Mysticism3
(Capra 1975, 305)
Wave-Particle Duality
Quantum mechanics is thought, even by many physicists, to be suffused with mysteries and paradoxes. Mystics seize upon these to support their views. The source of most of these claims can be traced to the so-called wave-particle duality of quantum physics: Physical objects, at the quantum level, seem to possess both local, reductionist particle and nonlocal, holistic wave properties that become manifest depending on whether the position or wavelength of the object is measured.
The two types of properties, wave and particle, are said to be incompatible. Measurement of one quantity will in general affect the value the other quantity will have in a future measurement. Furthermore, the value to be obtained in the future measurement is undetermined; that is, it is unpredictable-although the statistical distribution of an ensemble of similar measurements remains predictable. In this way, quantum mechanics obtains its indeterministic quality, usually expressed in terms of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. In general, the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics can only predict statistical distributions.(5)
Despite wave-particle duality, the particle picture is maintained in most quantum mechanical applications. Atoms, nuclei, electrons, and quarks are all regarded as particles at some level. At the same time, classical “waves” such as those of light and sound are replaced by localized photons and phonons, respectively, when quantum effects must be considered.
In conventional quantum mechanics, the wave properties of particles are formally represented by a mathematical quantity called the wave function, used to compute the probability that the particle will be found at a particular position. When a measurement is made, and its position is then known with greater accuracy, the wave function is said to “collapse,” as illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Wave function collapse in conventional quantum mechanics. An electron is localized by passing through an aperture. The probability that it will then be found at the particular position is determined by the wave function illustrated to the right of the aperture. When the electron is then detected at A, the wave function instantaneously collapses so that it is zero at B.
Einstein never liked the notion of wave function collapse, calling it a “spooky action at a distance.” In Figure 1, a signal would appear to propagate with infinite speed from A to B to tell the wave function to collapse to zero at B once the particle has been detected at A. Indeed, this signal must propagate at infinite speed throughout the universe since, prior to detection, the electron could in principle have been detected anywhere.
This surely violates Einstein’s assertion that no signals can move faster than the speed of light.
Although they are usually not so explicit, quantum mystics seem to interpret the wave function as some kind of vibration of a holistic ether that pervades the universe, as “real” as the vibration in air we call a sound wave. Wave function collapse, in their view, happens instantaneously throughout the universe by a willful act of cosmic consciousness.
In their book The Conscious Universe, Menas Kafatos and Robert Nadeau identify the wave function with “Being-In-Itself":
One could then conclude that Being, in its physical analogue at least, had been “revealed” in the wave function. . . . [A]ny sense we have of profound unity with the cosmos . . . could be presumed to correlate with the action of the deterministic wave function . . . .
(Kafatos and Nadeau 1990, 124)
Thus they follow Capra in imagining that quantum mechanics unites mind with the universe. But our inner sense of “profound unity with the cosmos” is hardly scientific evidence.
The conventional interpretation of quantum mechanics, promulgated by Bohr and still held by most physicists, says nothing about consciousness. It concerns only what can be measured and what predictions can be made about the statistical distributions of ensembles of future measurements. As noted, the wave function is simply a mathematical object used to calculate probabilities. Mathematical constructs can be as magical as any other figment of the human imagination-like the Starship Enterprise or a Roadrunner cartoon. Nowhere does quantum mechanics imply that real matter or signals travel faster than light. In fact, superluminal signal propagation has been proven to be impossible in any theory consistent with conventional relativity and quantum mechanics (Eberhard and Ross 1989).
Romantic Interpretations
Not everyone has been happy with the conventional interpretation of quantum mechanics, which offers no real explanation for wave function collapse. The desire for consensus on an ontological interpretation of quantum mechanics has led to hundreds of proposals over the years, none gaining even a simple majority of support among physicists or philosophers.
Spurred on by Einstein’s insistence that quantum mechanics is an incomplete theory, that “God does not play dice,” subquantum theories involving “hidden variables” have been sought that provide for forces that lie below current levels of observation (Bohm and Hiley 1993). While such theories are possible, no evidence has yet been found for subquantum forces. Furthermore, experiments have made it almost certain that any such theory, if deterministic, must involve superluminal connections.6
Nevertheless, quantum mystics have greeted the possibility of nonlocal, holistic, hidden variables with the same enthusiasm they show for the conscious wave function. Likewise, they have embraced a third view: the many worlds interpretation of Hugh Everett (Everett 1957).
Everett usefully showed how it was formally possible to eliminate wave function collapse in a quantum theory of measurement. Everett proposed that all possible paths continue to exist in parallel universes which split off every time a measurement is made. This has left the door open for the quantum mystics to claim that the human mind acts as sort of a “channel selector” for the path that is followed in an individual universe while existing itself in all universes (Squires 1990). Needless to say, the idea of parallel universes has attracted its own circle of enthusiastic proponents, in all universes presumably.
Effective Nonlocality
Admittedly, the quantum world is different from the world of everyday experience that obeys the rules of classical Newtonian mechanics. Something beyond normal common sense and classical physics is necessary to describe the fundamental processes inside atoms and nuclei. In particular, an explanation must be given for the apparent nonlocality, the instantaneous “quantum leap,” that typifies the non-commonsensical nature of quantum phenomena.
Despite the oft-heard statement that quantum particles do not follow well-defined paths in space-time, elementary-particle physicists have been utilizing just such a picture for fifty years. How is this reconciled with the quantum leap that seems to characterize atomic transitions and similar phenomena? We can see how, in the space-time diagram shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Effective nonlocality. How an apparent instantaneous “quantum leap” can be made between two points in space. An electron-positron pair is created at C by a quantum fluctuation of the vacuum. The positron annihilates an electron at A, undoing the original vacuum fluctuation so that there is zero net-energy change. The electron thus appears to make an instantaneous quantum leap from A to B. The distance AB is comparable to the wavelength associated with the particle, so “holistic” wave behavior results.
On the left, an electron (e-) is moving along a well-defined path. An electron-positron pair (e-e+) is produced at point C by a quantum fluctuation of the vacuum, allowed by the uncertainty principle. The positron annihilates the original electron at point A while the electron from the pair continues past point B. Since all electrons are indistinguishable, it appears as if the original electron has jumped instantaneously from A to B.
In Figure 2, all the particles involved follow definite paths. None moves faster than the speed of light. Yet what is observed is operationally equivalent to an electron undergoing superluminal motion, disappearing at A and appearing simultaneously at a distant point B. No experiment can be performed in which the electron on the left can be distinguished from the one on the right. A simple calculation shows that the distance AB is of the order of the (de Broglie) wavelength of the particle. In this manner, the “holistic” wave nature of particles can be understood in a manner that requires no superluminal motion and certainly no intervention of human consciousness.
Furthermore, since the quantum jump is random, no signal or other causal effect is superluminally transmitted. On the other hand, a deterministic theory based on subquantum forces or hidden variables is necessarily superluminal.
Thus quantum mechanics, as conventionally practiced, describes quantum leaps without too drastic a quantum leap beyond common sense. Certainly no mystical assertions are justified by any observations concerning quantum processes.
Conclusion
Quantum mechanics, the centerpiece of modern physics, is misinterpreted as implying that the human mind controls reality and that the universe is one connected whole that cannot be understood by the usual reduction to parts.
However, no compelling argument or evidence requires that quantum mechanics plays a central role in human consciousness or provides instantaneous, holistic connections across the universe. Modern physics, including quantum mechanics, remains completely materialistic and reductionistic while being consistent with all scientific observations.
The apparent holistic, nonlocal behavior of quantum phenomena, as exemplified by a particle’s appearing to be in two places at once, can be understood without discarding the commonsense notion of particles following definite paths in space and time or requiring that signals travel faster than the speed of light.
No superluminal motion or signalling has ever been observed, in agreement with the limit set by the theory of relativity. Furthermore, interpretations of quantum effects need not so uproot classical physics, or common sense, as to render them inoperable on all scales-especially the macroscopic scale on which humans function. Newtonian physics, which successfully describes virtually all macroscopic phenomena, follows smoothly as the many-particle limit of quantum mechanics. And common sense continues to apply on the human scale.
Notes
- For a review of alternate medicine, including “quantum medicine,” see Douglas Stalker and Clark Glymour, eds., Examining Holistic Medicine (Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1985).
- For a fuller discussion and references, see Victor J. Stenger, Physics and Psychics: The Search for a World Beyond the Senses (Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1990).
- L. A. Govinda, Foundations of Tibetan Mysticism (New York: Samuel Weiser, 1974), p. 225, as quoted in Capra 1975, p. 305.
- See, for example, Marilyn Ferguson, The Aquarian Conspiracy: Personal and Social Transformation in the 1980s (Los Angeles: Tarcher, 1980).
- Of course, in some cases those distributions may be highly peaked and thus an outcome can be predicted with high probability, that is, certainty for all practical purposes. In fact, this is precisely what happens in the case of systems of many particles, such as macroscopic objects. These systems then become describable by deterministic classical mechanics as the many-particle limit of quantum mechanics.
- For a fuller discussion and references, see Victor J. Stenger, The Unconscious Quantum: Metaphysics in Modern Physics and Cosmology (Amherst, N.Y. : Prometheus Books, 1995).
References
- Bohm D., and B. J. Hiley. 1993. The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. London: Routledge.
- Capra, Fritjof. 1975. The Tao of Physics. Boulder, Colorado: Shambhala.
- Chopra, Deepak. 1989. Quantum Healing: Exploring the Frontiers of Mind/Body Medicine. New York: Bantam.
- —. 1993. Ageless Body, Timeless Mind: The Quantum Alternative to Growing Old. New York: Random House.
- Eberhard, Phillippe H., and Ronald R. Ross. 1989. Quantum field theory cannot provide faster-than-light communication. Found. Phys. Lett. 2: 127-149.
- Everett III, Hugh. 1957. “Relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29: 454-462.
- Goswami, Amit. 1993. The Self-Aware Universe: How Consciousness Creates the Material World. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
- Kafatos, Menas, and Robert Nadeau. 1990. The Conscious Universe: Part and Whole in Modern Physical Theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Squires, Euan. 1990. Conscious Mind in the Physical World. New York: Adam Hilger.
- Wilber, Ken, ed. 1984. Quantum Questions: Mystical Writings of the World’s Great Physicists. Boulder, Colorado: Shambhala.
Victor Stenger
Victor J. Stenger is emeritus professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Hawaii and Visiting Fellow in Philosophy at the University of Colorado. His latest book is The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: How the Universe is Not Designed for Humanity. His previous books include Not By Design, Physics and Psychics, The Unconscious Quantum, and Timeless Reality: Symmetry, Simplicity, and Multiple Universes.- Darwinism and evolution have been promoted to make humanity think we ascended from animals and apes; to cut us off from the divine spark of creation as separate from God. In fact, it gives many so-called scientists the intellectual wiggle room to declare that they are atheists. Evolution was pushed to separate Mankind from thinking of ourselves as part of God's purposeful creation.
Einstein was promoted to the public to lead science down into a perpetual quagmire, a circular maze with no exit. This was done to purposely suppress the valid discoveries of Tesla, who rejected Einstein's Theory of Relativity.
The main purpose of promoting Einstein -- in addition to the implantation of that poisonous mental meme, that everything is "relative" and so one cannot possibly be expected to choose Good or Evil -- is the suppression of the fact that it is possible to travel faster than the speed of light, which since Einstein, has been used to hammer all scientists over the head as the "universal" speed limit.
Why was this promoted? Very simply: to keep us from prying open that "other" school of physics, which would enable people to think in terms of space travel to the stars and the planets beyond our own solar system, or to put it more symbolically, to raise their eyes and aspirations to the heavens.
Einstein's equation became a mental "visor" to keep us attached to this planet, to keep us Earthbound, not just physically, but also to reign in our thought. Opening that door to the "other" physics opens access to free, universal energy that can be tapped and harnessed forever, freeing mankind from the control of the Energy cartel, and thence the Banking cartel.
This admission of this New Physics would open the door towards the freedom of Mankind from both the spheres of energy and finance. It is for this reason that Tesla was savagely suppressed, and Einstein promoted as the definition of "genius" -- "the smartest man who every lived.".... except that he was a plagiarist, a fraud, and a shill for The Jewminati.
BLACK HOLES
HOW CAN BLACK HOLES EXIST IF IT IS AN ABSTRACT THEORETICAL CONCEPT?
Relativists claim that their equations 'predict' the existence of magical entities called black holes.
I sa'magical' because these enigmatic objects don't have shape or dimensions, yet the mathematicians insist that they have the ability to suck in real objects the likes of astronauts and clocks. Even more astounding, the experts claim that black holes are also capable of stretching a minute.
A closer look reveals that black holes are not really objects, but abstract mathematical concepts. This
alone makes it irrational to say that black holes exist. If we now add that the experts have conflicting
versions of what black holes are and how they form, the level of suspicion turns into outright skepticism. And when the mathematicians tell you that they have confirmed the existence of black holes, skepticism turns into brash cynicism. How can the mathematicians have confirmed the existence of black holes when they have yet to tell us what a black hole is. They cannot draw for you a 0-D singularity on a piece of paper! How could they have seen one in the middle of space?
The entire black hole charade is hilarious -- it certainly beats slapstick! The black hole is a circus act made for gullible idiots. You shouldn't miss it. Enjoy the show! Don't forget the popcorn.
DOES THIS LOOK LIKE A REALITY?
Stephen J. Crothers on Non-existence of Black Holes,The Failure of General Relativity.
http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/
A black hole simultaneously has and doesn't have form So is a black hole an object or is it a region?
An object is that which has shape. A region is that which doesn’t. The Sahara Desert is a region. The planet where this region is located is an object. No normal human being confuses your right index finger with a region in your hand. Does a black hole have shape or not? Is a black hole like a bucket? Is it like an ice-cream cone? Does it have a surface and length, width, and height? Or is a black hole non-dimensional, like love, justice, or beauty?
These questions are relevant because, for the purposes of Science, concepts do not exist. Only objects may be said to exist. Physics is the science of existence. It is ultimately concerned only with objects that exist. If a black hole is a concept, it doesn't exist and thus does not concern Physics.
If you were to try to answer these questions objectively, judging simply by looking at the cover of the July 2002 edition of Discover Magazine, you would conclude that the proponents of black holes are referring to a physical object. The artist clearly depicts a shape that is contoured by an unspecified medium and which resembles the inside of a toilet that has just been flushed. (See comparable versions in other sources. Indeed, the mere fact that relativists attempt to illustrate their beloved black hole indicate that they believe it to be a physical object.
ATOMS
UP NEXT...
BIG BANG
of NASA's Big Bang Premise
We have taken some notice of NASA's goal of certifying evolution thru its "Origins Program". We have also seen how that goal is being achieved thru a modus operandi involving high-tech computer programmed telescope and camera simulations. What needs to be made perfectly clear now are two factors which blow NASA's masquerade as "science" and reveal its true identity as an agent of a religion dedicated to the destruction of New Testament Christianity. Those two factors are: 1)NASA's entire rationale rests on the acceptance of the infinitely squirrelly Big Bang Expanding Universe hypothesis; and 2) That Big Bang hypothesis comes straight out of the Kabbala (Cabala) which is found in the anti-Christian "holy book" Zohar.
The Big Bang hypothesis--which is now the keystone of virtually all modern astronomical musings-- incorporates at least these four features (in addition to the Copernican Model) which cannot be altered lest NASA's plans (along with all of modern academic astronomy and physics) fall flat. These four features are:
A tiny bit of exploding energy, not God, created the universe and all that is in it.Since the Big Bang is the capstone of this gargantuan edifice of evidence-free hypotheses, discovering its roots should be of particular interest not only to those who hotly maintain that "Real Science" must be free of any kind of religious contamination or manipulation, but also to all folks anywhere who prefer Truth to deception regardless of any severe jolts to their personal beliefs and training which might result....
That exploded energy and all it allegedly created is still receding from the blast at great speed and provides a central plank in modern cosmology referred to as the expanding universe.
The Big Blast occurred 15-20 billion years ago. Some of this gas/matter formed the Earth 4.6 billion years ago (give or take a couple of months). All the points of light called stars which we can see with our eyes and with normal telescopes are said to be many light years away. The invisible but technology-manufactured galaxies of stars are said to be hundreds, and thousands, and millions, and billions of light years away...and on and on and on and on and on....
Einstein (named "Person of the Century" before '99 ended) still dictates the parameters of cosmology from the grave. The speed limit he put on light travel, the ether he removed so his calculations would work, the elasticity of time in space travel, the dogma that all motion is relative (the train and the train station nonsense), etc., is all cosmological gospel in the textbooks.
So, the long and the short of it is this: The whole ball of wax--from the Big Bang thru Einsteinian Relativity and NASA's Virtual Reality-based, Bible-bashing evolutionism--stems not from one single scientific fact, but rather, HAS ITS TAPROOT IN MYSTICAL KABBALISM.
Nuclear physicist, Dr. Gerald Schroeder, lets this cat out of the bag in his 17 page Web article entitled: "The Age of the Universe". Schroeder--formerly on the MIT staff, a member of the Atomic
Energy Commission, author, lecturer in Jerusalem, etc., does not challenge the Big Bang cosmology and all that rests upon it in this revealing article. He supports all of it. Indeed, the thrust of his article is to demonstrate that hundreds of years ago the Kabbala set forth a clear description of what is now called the Big Bang explanation for the origin of the universe. In other words: Big Bang cosmology has its roots in the Kabbala.
The evidence Schroeder presents is two-fold: A) That the Jewish Torah word for "the first day" in Genesis is really "day one", and the Hebrew meaning of that allows not only for the Big Bang's 15 billion year odyssey, but that it also accommodates Einstein's Relativity in all of its space, matter, and time hypotheses. B) Along with the Bible, however, even the anti-Christian Talmud refuses to agree with the Big Bang paradigm, and thus neither supplies a Scriptural, Spiritual foundation for the Big Bang hypothesis. But, not to worry, the Kabbalist (Cabalist) Nachmanides (Rabbi ben Nachman: 1194-1270) does provide Dr. Schroeder (and all of modern physics and astronomy!) with the
"Scriptural", Spiritual foundation that he (and how many others?!) are using to justify and establish Big Bangism and all that goes with it...all the while presenting Big Bangism as a purely secular "scientific" concept....
So, let's see what we've got here.... Our search engine brings up "The Jewish Student Online Research Center" to tell us about Nachmanides & the Kabbala (in case you don't already know...). We read:
"Nachmanides was the foremost halakist [rabbinical discussions of purely legal matters in the Talmud] of his age. Like Maimonides before him, Nachmanides was a Spaniard who was both a physician and a great Torah scholar. However, unlike the rationalist Maimonides, Nachmanides had a strong mystical bent. His biblical commentaries are the first ones to incorporate the mystical teachings of kabala."
Then, these two interesting sidelights are mentioned: "He (Nachmanides) was well-known for HIS AGGRESSIVE REFUTATIONS OF CHRISTIANITY... and could be described AS ONE OF HISTORY'S FIRST ZIONISTS, because he declared that it is a mitzvah to take possession of Israel and to live in it...."
Hmmm... I can't let those two nuggets go by without at least parenthetically underscoring: 1) The "aggressive" anti-Christian nature of Kabbalism (which is spelled out in the most malicious terms also in the Talmud); and 2) The fact that Kabbalism not only originated and endorses Big Bangism, but also provides the Spiritual heartbeat of the whole "back to Israel" Zionist movement which culminated with the establishment of Israel in 1948; and 3) That the controlling doctrine of "end time" Christian TV evangelism (HERE) is squarely based on the same heartbeat....
The origin of this doctrine is Kabbalist "scripture", not the Bible, and all the grunting and sweating to make it Biblical is not only false teaching but actually promotes a mystical religion sworn to eradicate the Bible's teachings! There are several books that show why this Kabbalist-Zionist doctrine is not possible if the New Testament of Jesus Christ is true. Kabbalists--along with
Talmudists--hate Jesus and His followers. They have tricked Christians not only into making Zionist Machiavelianism the most visible "Christian" thing on the Telly (HERE), they have also allowed Kabbalism to torpedo Bible credibility amidships with the crazy Big Bang cosmology. That cosmology demands a moving earth when the Bible says it isn't moving. That cosmology provides the billions of years for an old earth and gradual evolutionism when the Bible declares it was created ex nihilo in six days some 6000 years ago. Christians must wake up and see that the Kabbala and not the Bible is the source of many of their doctrines!) [Click HERE for info about short books on The Rapture...Millennialism.... Also, links that declare Millennialism Scripturally impossible can be evaluated: HERE - HERE - HERE - HERE. Christians are going to have to make a choice as to which "holy book" they are going to follow: The Bible with its New Testament of Jesus Christ, or Kabbala/Talmudism ,the sworn destroyers of that New Testament and of the Christ it presents.]
That parenthesis aside, the dictionary definition of Cabala (Kabbala) is appropriate here too. It says:
"Cabala: a system of esoteric theosophy [claims of mystical insight into the divine nature] and theurgy [ancient magic] developed by rabbis from the 7th to 18th centuries...based on a mythical method of interpreting the scriptures to penetrate sacred mysteries and foretell the future."
Also, under the heading "Kabbalah" put out by the Jewish Center mentioned above, these additional definitions and descriptions are given:
"Kabbalah is the name applied to the whole range of Jewish mystical activity...."
"The rabbis of the Talmud regarded the mystical study of God as important yet dangerous...." [They were right on that!]
"The most famous work of Kabbalah, the Zohar, was revealed to the Jewish world in the thirteenth century by Moses De Leon, who claimed that the book contained the mystical writings of the second-century rabbi Simeon bar Yochai...."
"Orthodox mystics are apt to see Bar Yochai not so much as the Zohar's author as the recorder of mystical traditions dating back to the time of Moses...."
"Whereas most commentaries interpret the Torah as a narrative and legal work, mystics are as likely to interpret it `AS A SYSTEM OF SYMBOLS WHICH REVEAL THE SECRET LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE AND EVEN THE SECRETS OF GOD'." Given that it is the Kabbalah's rendering of the Genesis Scripture which allows for modern cosmology's Big Bang paradigm (and NASA's "Origins Program"!), it is instructive to include another Jewish scholar's assessment of the Kabbala:
"A precisely opposite view on the value of kabbalah was taken by the late Professor Saul Lieberman, the great Talmud scholar of the Jewish Theology Seminary. In an introduction to a lecture [where several students wanted to study kabbalistic texts] he told them that...it is forbidden to have a course in nonsense...."
There is mention also that the kabbalah teaches a "belief in reincarnation"; that "kabbalah was widely considered to be the true Jewish theology between 1500 and 1800, and almost no one attacked it"; that "in recent years, there has been an upsurge of interest in kabbalah, and today it is commonly studied among Hasidic Jews, and among many non-Orthodox Jews WHO ARE PART OF THE COUNTERCULTURE." (Could this be part of the same counterculture we saw (HERE) which turned into the now highly perfumed Cyberpunks who passionately embrace the Virtual Reality technology?? Was Carl Hallucinate Sagan's real mission at NASA to use the Space Program as a Kabbalistic tool to destroy Bible Creationism once and for all with its Big Bang-dependent, Virtual Reality fueled "Origins Program"?? It walks and talks like a Duck.... Yikes! It is a Duck, Donald!
Quoting Big Banger, physicist Schroeder:
"Nachmanides the kabbalist...says that although the days [of Genesis One] are 24 hours each, they contain 'kol yemot ha olam'--all the ages and all the secrets of the world.... Nachmanides says:
There's only one physical creation, and that creation was a tiny speck.... In that speck was all the raw material that should be used for making everything else.... As this speck expanded out, this substance--so thin that it has no essence--turned into matter as we know it.... The moment that matter formed from this substanceless substance, time grabs hold.... Einstein's...E=MC2, tells us that energy can change into matter. And once it changes into matter, time grabs hold.... This moment of time before the clock begins for the Bible lasted about 1/100,000 of a second. A miniscule time. But in that time, the universe expanded from a tiny speck to about the size of the solar system. From that moment on we have matter, and time flows outward."
[c.3pp. further along...] "Let's look at the development of time, day by day, based on the expansion factor [1 million times 1 million from start till now].... The calculations come out to be as follows:
The first Biblical day lasted 24 hours...But...from our perspective it was 8 billion years.
The second day of 24 hours...was 4 billion years.
The third day...was 2 billion years.
The fourth day...1 billion years.
The fifth day...1/2 billion years.
The sixth day...1/4 billion years.
"Then you add it up [Schroeder continues] and you get 15 3/4 billion years... the same as modern cosmology allows...."
Well, in sanforized form there you have the Kabbalist basis for the Big Bang, the expanding universe, the Einsteinian clock, and key aspects of modern textbook cosmology. That foundation is Kabbalistic black magic using invented mathematics to make the rabbit come out of the hat. Prof. Lieberman says it is nonsense. Several big time physicists quoted in THE EARTH IS NOT MOVING declare that--as a result of such nonsense--the whole field of modern physics is a science that doesn't have both oars in the water, to put it mildly.
And yet, modern man's knowledge generally, and NASA's Bible-bashing agenda particularly, rests on this "nonsense". (HERE)
For Christians (and the great number of Jews not fooled by Kabbalistic Zionism and evolutionism)--and for anybody else who can receive a love of the Truth (II Thess. 2:10)--it is time to understand that the source of all those billions of years that uphold Satan's kingdom of Babylon today derives from an ancient mystic spiritual force determined to smash Bible
Christianity and bring about the triumph of Kabbalism, Zoharism, and Talmudism.
NASA'S role in all this is the proof in the pudding.
(Go back to "NASA's Agenda: Promoting Copernicanism and Evolutionism" - HERE)
(Go back to "NASA's Hanky-Panky: Virtual Reality Technology" - HERE)
The Real Universe?!
What's left but: A Small, Young Universe After All?!
(Also: "...Flagrant Deceptions in the Measurement of Star Distances" - HERE)
No comments:
Post a Comment